Day 7
Alright! Time check now. It’s 10:34pm now and we have to wake up early tomorrow again. We just got the flights settled for the thanksgiving week. if i am not mistaken, we are going in this order: Santa Barbara>Los Angeles>New York>Las Vegas>San Francisco>Los Angeles>Santa Barbara. Transportation alone’s gonna cost about S$900.
Anyway, today’s day two at Dos Pueblos High School. We cycled there! It was COLD with the the breeze when cycling. So glad that i have my gloves on. We reached in about 45mins at about 715am. Was planning to stand outside the class and wait for the next period but luckily the TA came along and i conveniently went in too. Today’s lesson was much better as there was some content teaching i suppose. while the students did their work (worksheet), I can walk around and help address any problem that they have. But i am ashamed to say that i misread one question and told the student the incorrect answer. However, i will like to mention in my defence that i have explained the concept behind doing the questions correctly so they were taught the right stuffs.
Day 8
Having settled the morning classes arrangements (that i will join the lesson at the 2nd period), we get to travel to school more leisurely. Nonetheless, woke up earlier than i am “supposed to” all cuz of the circus in my tummy. =.=
Today’s a great day and i got to see so much.
Engineer Academy:
DPHS has a very unique programme known as the Engineering Academy. This unique programme is so unconventional that the teachers faced a hard time registering the programme as an official and recognised course. Unlike the other course which are one-off (much like our university modules), students who are in the engineering academy will be required to stay through a 3 years programme to be able to gain full credits for the following three subjects: 1. Engineering Elective, 2. Art & Sculpturing. 3. Physics. With that, a valid question will be the implication of students who fall out of the programme (which reminded me of our Integrated Programme actually). In relation to that, depending on the year the sudent drop out, they will be recognised up to the labelled number (see above) according to the years they are in the programme (not exactly sure how to word that). So a student who drop out in year two will receive credits for engineering elective and art & sculpturing.
The programme will be entirely project based and of which require the students to make various products through their course. Grading will come in various forms. Since the curriculum is multidisciplinary in nature, there are also different modes of assessments. As one of the main aim is to ensure that students gain certain level of mastery through their course of work, teachers will help ensure that students have the required skill sets before “allowing” them to proceed on. The reason for the inverted commas is due to the fact that students will not be able to proceed with the course without mastering the previous skill set anyway. Emily (that’s the name of our guide i thinkk. Let’s assume it as such) mentioned that the kids are so motivated that they just come back during lunch breaks or stay till midnight just to catch up on their work anyway so there wasn’t much of a problem in terms of catching up for slower students.
The mentioning of slower students brings me to this one point that i really respect the teachers and students for. Apparently, the whole programme was designed to promote collaboration. In came this concept of a “village” where the students work as one to help one another. Faster students will help out by making more parts (such as soldered LEDs) which can help the slower students save some time. Say the slower student lack a few soldered green LEDs, he can then go “take some greens from the village”. What’s more, this programme is apparently supported by so many people ranging from retired mechanics to private production firms which help create the circuit boards required for the programming. Parent support group came together to set up a DPEAF which are able to gather 3 million required to earn the additional 3 million state grant. There’s a saying that goes like “it takes a village to raise a child” and here we got it (Gawd it~ lol, the way they will say this two words here). So I am really impressed by this collaborative spirit exhibited from this programme and i think (and hope) that we can encourage such encouraging environment in our system back home too.
***
oh, they had a rock student band playing today during lunch…
***
Biology lesson:
After attending my CT’s lessons, I joined a biology IB class after lunch. Again, i am ashamed to say that i cannot recall much (if any) about the Calvin cycle (other than it’s one of the most complicated system that i have to memorise then). Upon stepping into the classroom, i start to appreciate why the others (of the 5 of us that came) mention that they like the homeroom system. As compared to my CT’s, that classroom’s very much more (yes i know, i am kinda emphasizing here) decorated. Here are a few photos:
Students of this class are more like those students back home (at least the academically involved ones). They asked in class for the type of question that will be asked, the answers that should be given if certain questions are asked. But similar to most of the other lessons that i have attended, i realised that even for the heavily content based biology, the content covered in a class is relatively little. Time is again allowed for students to try out questions during class time (this time i was rather afraid to walk around to help the students since i am not too sure about the topic content). This made me think about our curriculum… We usually do a lot of content loading during lesson time and still, teachers rush to complete syllabus. So is it a case of us taking too much for us to chew on or are they taking too little?
After the lesson, i stayed back and talk to the teacher (who is also the Dept head for science i think). I was informed that the Advance Programme (AP) Syllabus used to have a higher content rigor than that of the International Baccalaureate (IB) which have a higher form of recognition and focus more on application and experimental techniques. They are however changing the state standard (AP) to be more similar to that of the IB and subsequently make it a national standard. Taking the Calvin’s cycle as an example, much like a “black box”, the IB syllabus require students to know what goes in and come out but not the elaborated intermediates. Looking back and thinking about my experiences, indeed, i DO NOT remember any of intermediates! Furthermore, with the ease of access to information through handheld devices, do we really need to load our brains with these terms? Of course knowing is good but can the time and effort be better spent on other areas such as application skills, data analysis skills or experimental skills?
In fact, i thought aloud about how our stakeholders themselves actually demand for lessons structured for exam-preparation instead of gaining knowledge to the teacher and we both agreed that unless the mode of assessment changes, stakeholders will continue to be concerned about performance at high stakes examinations and this will in turn shift the focus of the class lesson. With that much high stakes exams in Singapore, it is almost like telling the people to be indeed be very very very concerned about…… how you do in exams. Results are produced, but at the expense of creativity, innovation, application skills.
General Discussion:
In this section, I will like to mention some very worthy points mentioned when we (the five of us) share and talk about our experiences and opinions after the lessons. As it’s 12am now, I shall just leave it as point form:
- respect for the class
- positive, encouraging attitude among students and between teacher and students
- possible reasons:
- students are given the opportunities to decide and choose the course of action for themselves. This help make them more mature individuals and when reminded that their actions are incorrect, they acknowledge and apologise
- started from young, all the way from elementary school, students cheer on one another
(e.g. when a student reach the top of a progress chart that monitors the student behaviour, class will cheer and that individual will encourage others by saying that they will get it one day too) - acknowledge differences and diversity in abilities of student and helping students appreciate that.
(e.g. special needs student being all cool and saying that it’s ok for his slower progression since everyone is different) - different education progression
- Singapore system of having JC, Poly and ITE vs US’ Grade 9-12
- personally, i found the Singapore system good since it is able to cater students of different needs. vocational studies for more technical students and this will reduce the attrition rates of the system. Perhaps an additional point to think about is whether we end up counselling students to be overly pragmatic: telling them to go for things that they perform better instead of what they actually like. Many go to ITE just so they get some certificate qualification but that may not be what they truly needed. Good point is that it help them in their eventual application of job but that again, may not be what he/she wanted.
- parking lot
- just thought this was rather useful. Picked up by Zhi Wen during his observation, basically, it involves keeping a column on the board so keep unanswered questions raised during lesson. It may be questions that the teacher is unable to answer or address at the moment. In most of this scenarios, i will just give my reasoned answer and ask the kid to check it up and get back to me. But since i didn’t keep a note of it, i will not get back to the kid and usually, the kid will not return with an answer as well.
OK! There were much more but i guess they slipped off my rattan basket brain. Shall prep for bed. Early morning tomorrow today since we are joining their professional learning team.
***and i got to start working on my journals soon***